Patriotism and Self: The Meaning of National Existence and the Protection of Individual Rights#
In today's social discussions, the debate between "patriotism" and "self-love" often sparks intense arguments. One viewpoint suggests that only on the basis of patriotism can we truly talk about loving one's home and oneself. This perspective seems to emphasize the supreme status of the nation, arguing that individual interests and rights should be sacrificed for the strength and stability of the country. However, this logic not only reverses the purpose and meaning of national existence but may also lead to serious violations of individual rights.
The Relationship Between the State and the Individual#
The state is a political entity formed by people living in a specific area through a social contract. According to Locke's discourse in "Two Treatises of Government," the existence of the state is to protect the basic rights of individuals—life, liberty, and property. The establishment of the state is not a suppression of individual rights but rather a protection and promotion of these rights. Therefore, the meaning of the state's existence lies in providing a safe environment for each individual to freely pursue their happiness and development.
If we think according to the "love of country first" logic, we will find that this logic harbors significant risks. It implies that for the sake of a strong nation, individual interests and rights can be sacrificed. This sacrifice seems reasonable, even necessary. However, the danger of this viewpoint lies in its potential to infinitely expand the scope of "individual interests that need to be sacrificed." Whether it is certain rights of individuals or their specific interests, as long as they are labeled as necessary for the country, they can be arbitrarily deprived.
The Foundation of Individual Rights#
True patriotism should be built on the respect and protection of individual rights. Individuals are the foundation of the state, and the existence of the state is to serve individuals, not the other way around. The strength of the state should not come at the cost of sacrificing individual freedom and rights. On the contrary, the strength of the state should stem from the full protection and respect of each individual's rights. Only when the basic rights of individuals are protected can the state truly become a nation of the people.
"Man is the measure of all things." This philosophical proposition emphasizes the importance of the individual in society and the state. The ultimate meaning of the state's existence is to guarantee and expand individual rights. If individuals are forced to sacrifice certain rights or interests, the purpose of such sacrifice must be to better protect and expand these rights, rather than for an abstract, powerful nation. Such sacrifices must adhere to the principle of universal equality and be compensated within a negotiable framework. When it comes to inalienable rights to life, relevant discussions can only occur under the voluntary obligations of all parties being equal.
The True Meaning of Patriotism#
In this sense, true patriotism should be a demand on the state: the state should become the guarantor of individual freedom, rather than requiring individuals to sacrifice everything for the nation. The strength of the state should not come at the expense of individual freedom; instead, it should be realized through the protection of each individual's rights. Only then can the state earn the genuine love and loyalty of the people.
We should reflect on whether the existence of the state truly serves individual rights. If the policies and actions of the state lead to the weakening of individual rights, then how can such a state be called a "people's state"? In this case, the sentiment of patriotism loses its rightful foundation.
Harmonious Coexistence Between Individuals and the State#
To achieve harmonious coexistence between individuals and the state, it is essential to establish a foundation of full respect for individual rights. The state should take measures to ensure that every citizen can equally enjoy their rights and, when necessary, provide reasonable compensation mechanisms to reduce the loss of individual rights due to state needs. Such a state is truly worthy of our love and maintenance.
In modern society, the relationship between the state and individuals should be mutually reinforcing. The strength of the state comes from the efforts and creativity of each individual, while individual freedom and rights require the protection of the state. Only when the state truly becomes a defender of individual freedom and rights can we find a balance in the relationship between patriotism and self-love.
Conclusion#
In summary, patriotism and self-love are not opposing concepts. On the contrary, true patriotism should be the respect and protection of individual rights. The meaning of the state's existence lies in protecting individual freedom and rights, rather than demanding individuals sacrifice everything for the state. When the state can truly achieve this, the individual's patriotism will naturally emerge. We should strive to build a nation for people, where everyone can find their self-worth and sense of belonging.